|
August
14, 2010
A pleasant discovery, thanks to spammers
No, spammers haven't suddenly started sending
emails I want to receive.
As mentioned below, I got a load of backscatter
spam in the last few days, because spammers used several of my email
addresses in the "from" line of their spams. That means
that email sent to nonexistent addresses or to overflowing inboxes
bounced to me.
Spammers pass around an email list of known antispammers.
It's not just a list of people they don't like; it's a list of people
they know can cause real trouble for them, people who know how to
report their spam and websites, people who can get their illegal
sites shut down. Anyway, they periodically send us little tokens
of their affection.
One of my colleagues mentioned receiving a complaint
from a recipient of the backscatter -- not because my colleague's
address was in the "from," but because it was in the "reply-to."
Ah, so the spammers are putting us in both fields, trying to give
us the flame emails from angry recipients who hit "reply"
without realizing the spammer's email address isn't actually in
the headers anywhere.
So I took a look at the "reply-to" lines
in the original headers of some of the spam nondelivery messages.
A lot were .ru addresses and may have been the real addresses of
the spam sponsors. (A large percentage of sponsors of Russian spam
don't have websites, and they will provide a phone number for people
interested in their products and services. It's possible some also
accept email replies to their spam.)
But other addresses did look like they might be
fellow anti-spammers, my compatriots on the spammers' joe-job mailing
list. I've been looking up a few to see who they might be. I tracked
one via its domain registration to an interesting website, Word
to the Wise.
Word to the Wise is an email deliverability consultation
firm. They help make sure commercial email messages don't get blocked
by spam filters.
Isn't that what spammers are trying to do, when
they misspell words like "v1@gra" and add blocks of text
out of novels at the end of their messages? Sort of. But this is
about legitimate companies with interested customers who want
to use email to communicate. It's not spam if the recipient
wants to receive it. Those companies and recipients are frustrated
when a desired email ends up in the spam folder. And there's no
use filtering spam if you have to dig through the whole list anyway
to find mail that was improperly blocked.
The first lesson in preventing the emails you
send from being blocked as spam is to have your emails not be
spam. Deliverability consultants make sure there is a distinct
demarcation between what is socially acceptable commercial email
and what is not. They're just doing their part to prevent the decay
of modern civilization.
Word to the Wise has a blog explaining their principles,
and they post regularly. Some excerpts:
|
"There are so many ways a sender can collect an email
address without actually collecting consent to send mail to
that recipient. Many of the list building strategies
mentioned by a number of experts involve getting a fig leaf
of permission from recipients without actually having the
recipient agree to receive mail."
-
Poor delivery cant be fixed with technical perfection
|
|
"Without filters, I couldnt accurately find that
4.1% of real mail that I get. Without filters, I couldnt
do my job. Without filters, I couldnt find the real
receipts from purchases I actually made. Without filters,
I couldnt read and respond to mail I wanted.
"A mailbox overflowing with spam is unuseable, and email
marketers should be thankful that providers work so hard to
keep spam out. Otherwise, email wouldnt be useful for
anything."
- Spamfilters:
a marketers best friend
|
| "Just because a subscriber hits
the give me a coupon or enter me in the drawing
link does not mean they want mail from that sender. What it
really means is the recipient wants a chance to win something
or get $5 off their next purchase. Just because they closed
the loop to get an incentive does not mean the sender gets a
free pass through spam filters or is exempt from having their
mail marked as spam.
The marketing relationship between sender
and recipient is a lot more balanced than any other direct
marketing relationship. The sender cant ignore the recipients
preferences over the long term without suffering delivery
problems. Many email marketers, particularly those that didnt
start in email, forget that the relationship is different
and marketers have to respect the recipient."
- Check
your assumptions
|
|
"One of the easiest ways to avoid spam is to not pay
for acquisition email. Simply dont set up an affiliate
email marketing program. There are a lot of folks who dont
like me saying that, and who have argued vociferously with
me over the years. But email is not a good medium for acquiring
new customers if you dont intend to spam. Email is a
great medium for talking with current customers who are engaged
with a brand and a company, but currently it is a poor way
to acquire customers without spamming...
"Policing affiliate programs can be done, if the company
invests the time and energy into screening the program ...
you should know what kind of company you are hiring to represent
your brand. How can you afford to let spammers be that first
contact on your behalf?"
-
Avoiding spammers in affiliate programs
|
They also have a Twitter page @wise_laura
Email marketing can be done well. It has significant
advantages over snail mail in some (but not all) ways.
But it's important to understand that because
email can be done cheaply in huge quantities, sending a high volume
has stopped being the point. Any spammer can send quantity. If you're
a legitimate company that plans to stay in business a while, you
want to increase your brand recognition and reputation, and you
want to develop a relationship with your clients that will lead
to increased revenues over the long term. In email marketing, that
depends on quality, not quantity. The marketing company that sells
its services mainly in terms of how many emails will be sent on
your behalf or how many affiliates will be promoting your website
probably doesn't get it.
Congratulations to whoever it is at Word to the
Wise who made the A-list of people spammers don't like. I'm glad
the spammers led me to their website. (I don't imagine the spammers
are, though.)
August 12, 2010
Spammers spoofing antispammers' email addresses
If you start reporting spam, one of the first
things you learn is that the "from" address is meaningless.
You can put anything you want there. It's not even considered deceptive.
After all, you probably get lots of legitimate newsletters that
put "do_not_reply@" addresses in the from field. It's
to let recipients know that if they just hit "reply,"
no one will get their message. And if you check your work email
from home, you probably send mail using your work email address
in the "from" instead of your home address, to make sure
the subsequent replies go to the right address.
Yesterday, some spammers took their trusty list
of collected antispammer email addresses and started using them
as the "from" address in a large run of spam sent to Russian
recipients. That meant that any spam sent to invalid addresses or
over-quota inboxes bounced to whichever address was in the "from."
It also led to at least one angry spam recipient complaining about
the spam to the antispammer whose address was spoofed.
The same crew has been pulling similar stunts
for over a year now. The typical ones were spams "advertising"
their enemies' websites, sent to addresses of people they expected
to report the spam.
The forum at inboxrevenge.com
has been posting these as they arrive, so that the recipients can
judge what type of action is appropriate. Obviously, if a spammer
is going out of his way to try to get his spam reported,
you want to be sure to report it in such a way as to hurt him,
and not his target. The members-only section of the site has more
detailed discussion of the appropriate action in each case.
It's not clear what the spammers think they're
going to accomplish trying the same stuff over and over, when they
clearly aren't fooling us. We get thousands of their regular spams;
getting a few more isn't exactly intimidating.
What they are accomplishing is prompting
the inboxrevenge.com forum members to drop by and see what's going
on each time one of these starts arriving. It's a nice time to hear
from people who may have been too busy to drop by regularly. If
you visited this website because you got spam with an "@spamtrackers.org"
or "@spamtrackers.eu" email address in the "from"
field, please take the opportunity to piss off a spammer and drop
by the forum yourself. There's lots of information about spam and
the criminal activities it's advertising, and how to effectively
fight them.
|